F-GB6Q FUEL DISPENSER

F-GB6Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm) :Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V): 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp): 1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle: Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :350kg

Dimension(L×W×H): 1860*660*2190(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container :40ft: 17

than 1000L/min. The manufacturers of submersible pump now have many in market not only home brand but exported brand. As their structure and performance vary largely, the handbook will not introduce them one by fuel dispenser one. Some failure and trouble occurred during operation should be solved in accordance with the maintenance explanation provided by manufacturer. In order to ensure operation security difficult problem occurred should be inspected and repaired by the professional technician experienced or maintenance artificer sent by manufacturer in case of bringing accident. Article II Vapor Separator The main function of vapor separator is segregated vapor from oil and discharge so as to ensure accuracy of measure transducer under no foam condition. The principal technical indicator guideline of vapor separator is the capacity to segregate vapor and keep stability. 1-Upper cover 2-Exhaust valve seat 3-Exhaust pipe fuel dispenser 4-Float 5-Fuel return valve 6-Frame 7-Ball-float 8-Strainer 9-Spring seat 10-Check valve 11-Check valve seat 12\13-Outlet pipe 14-Gas outlet valve Diagram 2-12: Structure cutaway view of vapor separator Check valve should be installed between vapor fuel dispenser separator and measure transducer. Some manufacturers mount check valve in the pipeline of vapor separator and transducer, but others install check valve in the inner of vapor separator. Check valve has the function of preventing oil flow backward. The segregated capacity is the major technical parameter of vapor separator. Under low pressure and high temperature a little of gas dissolved in oil is easily separated out. The vapor should be divided out before flowing into measure transducer so as to keep the accuracy of fuel dispenser in the scope stipulated by national standards. Stability is another key parameter of vapor separator. In case that the design and manufacture sector of pump and vapor separator exist unstable elements, the pressure pulse fluctuation of fuel dispenser’s hydraulic system will increase, even affecting the measur

Unattended　　 Petrol　　 Kiosk　　 ATM　　 PhoneWireless　　 Parking　　 Contactless (EMV future)　　COULD BE INTERMIXED IN SINGLE　　 ENVIRONMENT　　 fuel dispenser EMVCo Level 2 Certificate　　 Relates to Software conforming to EMV standards　　 Covers　　 Interface to Card Application　　 Application Identification　　 Driving smart card readerwriter　　 Application handling　　 Application exceptionerror handling　　 Interface to POSPOIPayment System　　 High probability of changesenhancements to Standards　　 Localregional non EMV rules (Business Rules)　　 Not part of EMVCo Level 2 tests　　 mandated by local acquirer or standards body　　 PIN entry principles　　 PIN number only goes between PIN pad　　 and chip　　 If PIN pad not integrated in reader must　　 have 3DES encryption　　 fuel dispenser PIN number not exposed out side of Level　　 1 device except if online PIN verification　　 required then encrypted　　 Certificates　　 UK Acquirers will want to see:　　 EMV Level 1 certificate　　 EMV Level 2 certificate fuel dispenser (plus errata)　　 VISA PED Security　　 Common Criteria Security Evaluation　　 Architecture diagram including 3rd parties　　 Your test environment plans　　 Live environment configuration　　 Chip and PIN in UK　　 Commercial and operational perspective　　 Northampton Trial　　 UK roll out　　 Liability shift　　 Chip and PIN Project Management Office　　 Extensive Communication Programme　　 Northampton Trial　　 3 month trial started May 2003　　 200 000 PIN enabled cards　　 1 000 retail outlets 1 250 terminals　　 180 ATMs　　 170 000 successful transactions　　 (continues at 35 000 per week)　　 Lar

h conglomerate, which includes the world s second- largest construction group as well as mobile-telecoms, television and engineering arms, are worth 60 times what they were in 1979, compared with a twentyfold in fuel dispenser crease in an index of nearly 250 leading French companies. Behind this undeniable success lies a story of how the founding family manoeuvred during many years to call the shots. In the mid-1980s the Bouygues family (pronounced Bweeg) was still a relatively small investor in the company that bears its name. However, today the Bouygues brothers rank as the dominant shareholders of a firm with a stockmarket value of around â‚?5 billion ($19.7 billion). This they accomplished without launching a takeover bid or paying a premium for control. Instead their power has come about gradually, through a highly complex series of transactions. The Economist has studied dozens of private- and public-company filings cov fuel dispenser ering nearly 20 years to build up five snap-shots of the group s ownership and structure. The story that emerges is a convoluted one, full of dealing in which the interests and the assets of the Bouygues family were repeatedly mingled with those of Bouy fuel dispenser gues SA. It could worry investors that all this could be done without breaking the law, especially as other families with quoted firms have had comparable schemes. What matters, though, is that the non-family shareholders have not fully benefited from deals over the years. Moreover, because of these transactions, investors have lost influence over their company to a dominant shareholder. In essence, the Bouygues financial cunning enabled the family to acquire stakes in companies that arguably should have been entirely in the hands of Bouygues SA. But the dealing was extremely subtle; any ordinary investor living through the drawn-out creation of the Bouygues family s stake would have found it almost impossible to follow. This raises a broader lesson. Investors battered by scandals over stock-options and golden parachutes someti